Allwood D. Engaging clinicians in quality improvement through National Clinical Audit. London: Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP); 2014. https://www.hqip.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/engaging-clinicians-in-qi-through-national-clinical-audit.pdf.
Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–25.
Article
Google Scholar
Baird S. Audit of Scottish Healthcare Audits. 2015.
Google Scholar
Benn J, Arnold G, D’Lima D, et al. Evaluation of a continuous monitoring and feedback initiative to improve quality of anaesthetic care: a mixed-methods quasi-experimental study. Heal Serv Deliv Res. 2015;3(32):1–248.
Article
Google Scholar
Bytautas JP, Gheihman G, Dobrow MJ. A scoping review of online repositories of quality improvement projects, interventions and initiatives in healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017;26(4):296–303.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Daudt HML, Van Mossel C, Scott SJ. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13(1):48.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Davidoff F, Batalden P. Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: the beginning of a consensus project. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(5):319–25.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Dixon N. Proposed standards for the design and conduct of a National Clinical Audit or quality improvement study. Int J Qual Heal Care. 2013;25(4):357–65.
Article
Google Scholar
Dixon-woods M, Mcnicol S, Martin G. The Health Foundation. Overcoming Challenges to Improving Quality. 2012.
Google Scholar
Etzioni DA, Wasif N, Dueck AC, et al. Association of hospital participation in a surgical outcomes monitoring program with inpatient complications and mortality. JAMA - J Am Med Assoc. 2015;313(5):505–11.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Foy R. Study Protocol: Optimising outputs of National Clinical Audits to support orginsations to improve quality of care and clinical outcomes. 2017.
Google Scholar
Foy R, Skrypak M, Alderson S, et al. Revitalising audit and feedback to improve patient care. BMJ. 2020;368:m213.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13(1):117.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Gould NJ, Lorencatto F, During C, et al. How do hospitals respond to feedback about blood transfusion practice? A multiple case study investigation. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(11):e0206676.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
CAS
Google Scholar
Greenhalgh J, Dalkin S, Gooding K, et al. Functionality and feedback: a realist synthesis of the collation, interpretation and utilisation of patient-reported outcome measures data to improve patient care. Heal Serv Deliv Res. 2017;5(2):1–280.
Article
Google Scholar
Hemmila MR, Cain-Nielsen AH, Jakubus JL, Mikhail JN, Dimick JB. Association of hospital participation in a regional trauma quality improvement collaborative with patient outcomes. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(8):747–56.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
HQIP. Information governance in local quality improvement. 2017.
Google Scholar
Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, et al. Audit and feedback : effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes ( review ). Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2012;6(6):CD000259.
Google Scholar
Ivers NM, Barrett J. Using report cards and dashboards to drive quality improvement: lessons learnt and lessons still to learn. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018;27:417–20.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ivers NM, Sales A, Colquhoun H, et al. No more “business as usual” with audit and feedback interventions: towards an agenda for a reinvigorated intervention. Implement Sci. 2014;9(1):1–8.
Article
Google Scholar
Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5(1):1–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Levy SM, Phatak UR, Tsao K, et al. What is the quality of reporting of studies of interventions to increase compliance with antibiotic prophylaxis? J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(5):770–9.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Jones EL, Dixon-Woods M, Martin GP. Why is reporting quality improvement so hard? A qualitative study in perioperative care. BMJ Open. 2019;9(7):1–8.
Google Scholar
Jones EL, Lees N, Martin G, Dixon-Woods M. How well is quality improvement described in the perioperative care literature? A systematic review. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2016;42(5):196–206.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Lilford R, Mohammed MA, Spiegelhalter D, Thomson R. Use and misuse of process and outcome data in managing performance of acute medical care: avoiding institutional stigma. Lancet. 2004;363(9415):1147–54.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
McVey L, Alvarado N, Keen J, et al. Institutional use of National Clinical Audits by healthcare providers. J Eval Clin Pract. 2020;(February):1–8. https://www.nela.org.uk/downloads/The%20Fourth%20Patient%20Report%20of%20the%20National%20Emergency%20Laparotomy%20Audit%202018%20-%20Full%20Patient%20Report.pdf.
Montroy J, Breau RH, Cnossen S, et al. Change in adverse events after enrollment in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(1):e0146254.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
CAS
Google Scholar
NELA Project Team. Fourth patient report of the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit. RCoA London. 2018;(November):1–137.
Neuburger J, Currie C, Wakeman R, et al. The impact of a national clinician-led audit initiative on care and mortality after hip fracture in England: an external evaluation using time trends in non-audit data. Med Care. 2015;53(8):686–91.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Ogrinc G, Davies L, Goodman D, Batalden P, Davidoff F, Stevens D. SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25(12):986–92.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Peden CJ, Moonesinghe SR. Measurement for improvement in anaesthesia and intensive care. Br J Anaesth. 2016;117(2):145–8.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Peden CJ, Stephens T, Martin G, et al. Effectiveness of a national quality improvement programme to improve survival after emergency abdominal surgery (EPOCH): a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10187):2213–21.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Phekoo K, Clements J, Bell D. National Clinical Audit Quality Assessment. 2014.
Google Scholar
RCP, HQIP. Unlocking the potential supporting doctors to use National Clinical Audit to drive improvement. 2018.
Google Scholar
Robert GB, Anderson JE, Burnett SJ, et al. A longitudinal, multi-level comparative study of quality and safety in European hospitals: the QUASER study protocol. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:1–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Roos-Blom M-J, Gude WT, de Jonge E, et al. Impact of audit and feedback with action implementation toolbox on improving ICU pain management: cluster-randomised controlled trial. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019;28:1007–15.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Ross JS, Williams L, Damush TM, Matthias M. Physician and other healthcare personnel responses to hospital stroke quality of care performance feedback: a qualitative study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25(6):441–7.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Shah T, Patel-Teague S, Kroupa L, Meyer AND, Singh H. Impact of a national QI programme on reducing electronic health record notifications to clinicians. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018:bmjqs-2017–007447.
Sinha S, Keenan D, Krishnamoorthy S, Richards M. Workshop report: using trust-level National Clinical Audit data to support quality assurance and quality improvement. HQIP. 2016;(June).
Stephens TJ, Peden CJ, Pearse RM, et al. Improving care at scale: process evaluation of a multi-component quality improvement intervention to reduce mortality after emergency abdominal surgery (EPOCH trial). Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):142.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Sykes M, Thomson R, Kolehmainen N, Allan L, Finch T. Impetus to change: a multi-site qualitative exploration of the national audit of dementia. Implement Sci. 2020;15(1):45.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Taylor A, Neuburger J, Walker K, Cromwell D, Groene O. How is feedback from National Clinical Audits used? Views from English National Health Service trust audit leads. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2016;21(2):91–100.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Taylor MJ, McNicholas C, Nicolay C, Darzi A, Bell D, Reed JE. Systematic review of the application of the plan-do-study-act method to improve quality in healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23(4):290–8.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
The Bristol Royal Infirmary Inquiry. Learning from Bristol: The Department of Health's Response to the Report of the Public Inquiry into children's heart surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984-1995. 2002. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/273320/5363.pdf.
The King’s Fund. Integrating care throughout the patient’s surgical journey | The King’s Fund. https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/events/integrating-care-throughout-patients-surgical-journey. Accessed 30 May 2018.
The Royal College of Anaesthetists. Perioperative medicine the pathway to better surgical care. 2015.
Google Scholar
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16(1):1–10.
Article
Google Scholar
Vallance AE, Fearnhead NS, Kuryba A, et al. Effect of public reporting of surgeons ’ outcomes on patient selection, “ gaming”, and mortality in colorectal cancer surgery in England : population based cohort study. BMJ. 2018;361:k1581.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Vu JV, Collins SD, Seese E, et al. Evidence that a Regional Surgical Collaborative can transform care: surgical site infection prevention practices for colectomy in Michigan. J Am Coll Surg. 2018;226(1):91–9.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wells S, Tamir O, Gray J, Naidoo D, Bekhit M, Goldmann D. Are quality improvement collaboratives effective? A Systematic Review BMJ Qual Saf. 2018;27(3):226–40.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar