Skip to main content

Table 2 Study, surgery, and intervention characteristics of 70 randomized trials of prehabilitation

From: Reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in prehabilitation: a scoping review

Study characteristics

 Year of publication, n (%)

70

100%

  1995

1

1%

  2004

1

1%

  2006

2

3%

  2009

2

3%

  2010

2

3%

  2011

1

1%

  2012

2

3%

  2013

3

4%

  2014

6

9%

  2015

2

3%

  2016

4

6%

  2017

5

7%

  2018

7

10%

  2019

3

4%

  2020

9

13%

  2021

13

19%

  2022

7

10%

 Origin of studies, n (%)

70

100%

  Europe

32

46%

  North America

25

36%

  Asia

11

16%

  Australia

1

1%

  South America

1

1%

 Type of prehabilitation program, n (%)

70

100%

  Exercise only

40

57%

  Nutrition only

2

3%

  Functional

2

3%

  Cognitive training

3

4%

  Multimodal

23

33%

 Population included, n (%)

70

100%

  Surgery, non-oncologic

30

43%

  Surgery, oncologic

32

46%

  Mixed oncologic and non-oncologic

8

11%

Surgery characteristics1, n (%)

 Non-oncological surgery

38

100%

  Orthopedic

19

50%

  Heart

6

16%

  Spine

4

11%

  Colorectal

3

8%

  Lung

1

3%

  Hernia

1

3%

  Mixed non-oncologic surgeries

4

11%

 Oncologic surgery

40

100%

  Colorectal

14

35%

  Lung

12

30%

  Urological

4

10%

  Esophageal

2

5%

  Hepatobiliary

1

3%

  Pancreatic

1

3%

  Mixed oncologic surgeries

6

15%

 Sample size, n (%)

70

100%

  Reached

24

34%

  Not reached

31

44%

  Not calculated

15

21%

 Number of patients per trial

  Min–max number

15–668

  Mean (SD)

89.8 (93.2)

  Median [IQR]

60.0 [34.0–110.0]

 Primary outcome, n (%)

70

100%

  Performance based

25

36%

  Clinician reported

22

31%

  Patient reported

10

14%

  Observer reported

3

4%

  Biomarker

1

1%

  Mixed

5

7%

  Unclear/not specified

4

6%

 Primary outcome significant, n (%)

70

100%

  Yes

45

64%

  No

25

36%

 Baseline reporting of patient characteristics, n (%)

70

100%

  Malnutrition

8

11%

  Frailty

4

6%

  Sarcopenia

0

0%

Intervention characteristics

 Location of prehabilitation delivery, n (%)

70

100%

  Home

20

29%

  Supervised

28

40%

  Tele-prehab

1

1%

  Combination

19

27%

  Not specified

2

3%

 Nutrition intervention, n (%)

70

100%

  Yes

16

23%

  No

51

73%

  Usual care nutrition

3

4%

 Psychological intervention, n (%)

70

100%

  Yes

13

19%

  No

57

81%

 Duration of prehabilitation (weeks)

  Min–max

1–14

  Mean (SD)

4.7 (2.5)

  Median [IQR]

4.0 [3.0–6.0]

 Total prehabilitation sessions

  Min–max

3–126

  Mean (SD)

18.8 (17.3)

  Median [IQR]

14.0 [11.2–20.8]

 Guidelines cited

N

100%

  CONSORT

17

24%

  CONSORT & TIDieR

1

1%

  CONSORT & CERT

1

1%

  CONSORT flow chart

12

17%

  1. 1Because 8 studies included both cancer and non-cancer patients, surgery characteristics overlap. Min Minimal value; Max Maxima value, SD Standard deviation, IQR Interquartile range, ns Not specified, CONSORT Consolidated Standards of Reporting of Trials, TIDieR Template for Intervention Description and Replication, CERT Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template