Skip to main content

Table 1 Basic characteristics of the included studies

From: Enhanced recovery after surgery for hip fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Studies

Years

Country, Center

Number(E/C)

Mean age(E/C)

Male/Female

Follow-up duration

Type of fracture

Study design

Pollmann (Pollmann et al. 2019)

2019

Single-center, Norway

1140/1090

79.6/79.7

701/1529

1 year

Proximal femur fracture

Cohort study

Kang (Kang et al. 2019)

2019

Single-center, China

50/50

77.81/78.32

31/69

30 d

Intertrochanteric fracture

Cohort study

Gomez (Gomez et al. 2019)

2019

Single-center, France

27/27

84.5/85.0

14/40

1 year

Peritrochanteric fracture

Cohort study

Haugan (Haugan et al. 2017)

2017

Single center, Norway

1032/788

83.1/83.1

512/1308

1 year

Hip fracture

Cohort study

Liu (Liu et al. 2017)

2017

Multicenter, USA

2514/2488

79.7/79.3

1586/3416

30 d

Hip fracture

Cohort study

Macfie (Macfie et al. 2012)

2012

Single-center, Denmark

117/115

82.5/82.7

52/180

6 months

Proximal femoral fractures

Cohort study

Pedersen (Pedersen 2008)

2008

England

178/357

/

127/408

1 year

Hip fracture

Cohort study