Association between preoperative haemoglobin concentration and cardiopulmonary exercise variables: a multicentre study

  • James M Otto1, 2Email author,

    Affiliated with

    • Alasdair F O’Doherty2,

      Affiliated with

      • Philip J Hennis2,

        Affiliated with

        • Jackie A Cooper3,

          Affiliated with

          • Michael PW Grocott2, 4,

            Affiliated with

            • Chris Snowdon6,

              Affiliated with

              • John B Carlisle7,

                Affiliated with

                • Michael Swart7,

                  Affiliated with

                  • Toby Richards1 and

                    Affiliated with

                    • Hugh E Montgomery5

                      Affiliated with

                      Perioperative Medicine20132:18

                      DOI: 10.1186/2047-0525-2-18

                      Received: 13 May 2013

                      Accepted: 2 September 2013

                      Published: 13 September 2013



                      Preoperative anaemia and low exertional oxygen uptake are both associated with greater postoperative morbidity and mortality. This study reports the association among haemoglobin concentration ([Hb]), peak oxygen uptake ( peak) and anaerobic threshold (AT) in elective surgical patients.


                      Between 1999 and 2011, preoperative [Hb] and cardiopulmonary exercise tests were recorded in 1,777 preoperative patients in four hospitals. The associations between [Hb], peak and AT were analysed by linear regression and covariance.


                      In 436 (24.5%) patients, [Hb] was <12 g dl-1 and, in 83 of these, <10 g dl-1. Both AT and peak rose modestly with increasing [Hb] (r2 = 0.24, P <0.0001 and r2 = 0.30, P <0.0001, respectively). After covariate adjustment, an increase in [Hb] of one standard deviation was associated with a 6.7 to 9.7% increase in peak, and a rise of 4.4 to 6.0% in AT. Haemoglobin concentration accounted for 9% and 6% of the variation in peak and AT respectively.


                      To a modest extent, lower haemoglobin concentrations are independently associated with lower oxygen uptake during preoperative cardiopulmonary exercise testing. It is unknown whether this association is causative.


                      Anaemia Cardiopulmonary exercise testing CPET Haemoglobin concentration Oxygen uptake Surgery



                      Anaerobic threshold


                      Body mass index


                      Cardiopulmonary exercise testing


                      Hemoglobin concentration


                      Revised cardiac risk index


                      Total haemoglobin mass


                      Carbon dioxide


                      Ventilatory equivalent for oxygen


                      Ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide


                      Oxygen uptake


                      peak oxygen uptake.


                      Increased mitochondrial oxygen uptake requires increased cellular oxygen delivery. When oxygen delivery, or utilization, fails to meet metabolic demand, anaerobic cytoplasmic metabolism significantly augments aerobic mitochondrial ATP generation with a consequent increase in lactic acid production and accumulation. It has been suggested that an imbalance in oxygen demand-supply contributes to the point during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) known as the anaerobic threshold (AT) [1], although this physiological underpinning is not without controversy [2, 3]. Major surgery places substantial metabolic demands upon the patient and may increase resting oxygen uptake from an average preoperative value of 110 ml min-1 m-2 to approximately 170 ml min-1 m-2[4, 5]. Lower preoperative exertional oxygen uptake ( ), both the peak and that noted at AT, are associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality [68].

                      Each gram of haemoglobin carries 1.34 ml of oxygen when fully saturated. Anaemia, commonly defined as a haemoglobin concentration ([Hb]) below 13 g dl-1 (males) and 12 g dl-1 (non-pregnant females), reduces the blood’s oxygen carriage capacity. Anaemia is common amongst preoperative patients, with a prevalence ranging from 5% to 76% [9]. Anaemia and blood transfusion are associated with poor postoperative outcomes [1016].

                      Oxygen delivery limits maximal oxygen uptake during exercise under normoxic conditions [17, 18]. Increases in [Hb] increase peak, whilst acute reductions in [Hb] lower peak and endurance performance [1921]. However, the extent to which postoperative outcomes are dependent upon interactions between [Hb] and is unknown. We analysed a large multicentre dataset to explore the relationship between preoperative [Hb] and .


                      Patient population

                      We analysed cardiopulmonary exercise (CPET) data collected between December 1999 and February 2011 by four centres: University College London Hospitals NHS Trust (UCLH); the Whittington Hospital NHS Trust; Torbay Hospital, South Devon Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust; and the Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Patients had been routinely tested as part of the clinical service before elective surgery: maxillofacial, hepatobiliary, vascular, upper gastrointestinal, colorectal, orthopaedic, bariatric and other specialties (mainly urological).

                      Following discussion among the researchers and the local Research and Development and clinical governance departments, formal ethical approval was waived and confirmation of audit status granted due to the nature of the data collection.

                      Cardiopulmonary exercise testing

                      Across all testing sites, CPET was performed according to the American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians (ATS/ACCP) guidelines, under stable environmental conditions, with continuous 12 lead ECG monitoring and in the presence of a clinician [22].

                      Patients pedalled an electromagnetically-braked cycle ergometer (Lode BV, Groningen, Netherlands), with breath-by-breath respiratory gas analysis performed by various machines, (UCL-Cortex Biophysik, Leipzig, Germany; Torbay and Newcastle-Medical Graphics, Minnesota, USA) calibrated according to ATS/ACCP guidelines. During exercise, oxygen uptake ( ) and carbon dioxide output ( ) were recorded, together with respiratory rate, tidal volume, ventilation and end-tidal gas tensions.

                      A 3-minute rest period followed fitting of relevant equipment, after which unloaded cycling was performed at a cadence of 60 to 70 rpm for 3 minutes. Thereafter, patients performed a symptom-limited continuous incremental exercise ramp protocol, determined by the physiologist or clinician on the basis of predictive work rate algorithms and patient-reported activity levels [23]. The test continued (usually for 8 to 12 minutes) until volitional exhaustion occurred, or the patient was unable to maintain a cadence of 40 rpm for more than 30 seconds despite encouragement. The clinician stopped the test if the patient developed a sign or symptom listed in the ATS/ACCP guidelines, which included: new arrhythmia; more than 2 mm of ST elevation or depression on the ECG; an arterial blood pressure of more than 250 mm Hg systolic or 120 mm Hg diastolic (see 2003 ATS/ACCP statement on Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing for an exhaustive list) [23]. Following termination of CPET, patients were encouraged to perform a ‘warm-down’ period of unloaded cycling.

                      The anaerobic threshold was estimated by an exercise physiologist or consultant physician, both experienced in CPET interpretation, using a combination of the modified V-slope, ventilatory equivalents and end-tidal pressure methods [24], which improves the rigor of AT detection. The peak was recorded as the highest average over the final 30 s period [25]. The ventilatory equivalents for carbon dioxide ( ) and oxygen ( ) were recorded at the AT [26].

                      We recorded age, sex, height, weight, body mass index (BMI, kg m-2) and Lee’s Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) from patients’ medical histories [27]. In addition, serum creatinine, obtained from hospital electronic records systems, was used as an index of renal function. At UCLH and the Whittington Hospital, [Hb] was measured on the day of CPET (HemoCue AB, Angelholm, Sweden). Preoperative [Hb] was recorded from hospital electronic record systems within 3 days of CPET at Newcastle and at the time of pre-assessment (usually within 4 weeks of CPET) at Torbay. No patient received a blood transfusion between the [Hb] measurement and the CPET.

                      Statistical analysis

                      Statistical analysis was performed using Stata Version 11 (StataCorp, Texas, USA). Gaussian distributions of the data were verified by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, in conjunction with visual inspection of histogram charts. A difference between data was considered significant if P <0.05. We transformed seven continuous variables with skewed distributions by taking their log10: weight, BMI, AT, peak, , , and creatinine. These variables are presented as geometric means and approximate SD.

                      Historically, measurements of oxygen uptake have been indexed to body mass (ml kg-1 min-1), as it allows comparisons between individuals [28, 29]. However, this value may still vary with body mass [3032]. We therefore adjusted the measured oxygen uptake by raising the body mass to a power determined by allometric scaling using the power function ratio (Y/Xβ) [29, 33]. Specifically, the allometric relationship between body size and performance measure (AT or peak) is determined by the allometric equation below (see equation 1), where Y is AT or peak, X is body mass, β is a scaling exponent, a is the proportionality constant (intercept), and ϵ is the multiplicative error term, which overcomes the problem of heteroscedasticity [34].
                      The allometric relationship between body mass (X) and fitness parameter (Y) is expressed using the logarithmic transformation of equation 1 so that

                      where β is the sample specific slope of the linear least squares regression line calculated by log-linear regression analysis (that is, scaling exponent β was 0.83 in the current study) and log a is the equivalent constant value (a) [34]. We further built models by adjustment for the determinant variable (AT and peak) to potential confounders. Three levels of increasing adjustment were used: i) a basic adjustment for testing site; ii) an extended adjustment for testing site, age and sex; and iii) a fully adjusted model for all known confounders (testing site, age, sex, revised cardiac risk index, diabetes, creatinine and operation category). Results were standardised for testing centre by the inclusion of dummy variables in the regression model.

                      The effect size was expressed as the percentage increase in for a 1 g dl-1 (or one standard deviation) increase in [Hb]. Partial correlations between [Hb] and CPET markers were performed controlling for confounding variables. Regression models assessed the associations between and [Hb] and the proportion of variance in oxygen uptake explained by variation in [Hb]. Covariance models were analysed with [Hb] as a clinically relevant categorical variable ([Hb] <10 g dl-1; 10 to 12 g dl-1; >12 g dl-1), as similarly described [15, 35]. The adjusted values for generated by the model were transformed back to the original scale to give geometric means and approximate standard deviations by [Hb] group.


                      We analysed data from 1,777 patients (1,108 male) undergoing various operations: 549 vascular (31%), 530 colorectal (30%), 337 bariatric (19%), 75 upper gastrointestinal (4%), 66 hepatobiliary (4%), 48 maxillofacial (3%) and 172 other operations (9%). Contributions from each centre were as follows: 804 UCLH; 484 Whittington; 305 Torbay; 184 Newcastle. The mean (SD) peak and AT were 15.5 (5.9) and 11.2 (3.5) ml kg-1 min-1 respectively. The and at AT were 25.9 (6.4) and 30.8 (6.4). The AT was not identified in 146 patients (8.2%). Mean (SD) [Hb] and creatinine were 13.2 (1.8) g dl-1 and 82 (30) μmol l-1. Table 1 lists other physical characteristics.
                      Table 1

                      Physical characteristics of the whole-study cohort





                      Age (yr)




                      Height (cm)




                      Weight (kg)




                      BMI (kg m-2)




             peak (ml min-1)




                      AT (ml min-1)




                      BMI body mass index, AT anaerobic threshold, peak, peak oxygen uptake.

                      Relationships between haemoglobin concentration and oxygen uptake

                      Figure 1 graphs the increase in unadjusted peak with [Hb], whilst Figure 2 shows the relationship between unadjusted oxygen uptake at AT and [Hb]. The peak and AT increased across each [Hb] group (Table 2). More patients awaiting colorectal surgery were anaemic: in 144/530 (27%) of these, the [Hb] was 10 to 12 g dl-1 and in 32/530 (6%) the [Hb] was <10 g dl-1.
                      Figure 1

                      Linear regression between unadjusted peak (ml min -1 ) and haemoglobin concentration ([Hb]), n = 1,774.

                      Figure 2

                      Linear regression between unadjusted oxygen uptake at anaerobic threshold (AT) (ml min -1 ) and haemoglobin concentration ([Hb]), n = 1,631.

                      Table 2

                      Physical characteristics across haemoglobin concentration ([Hb]) group (<10 g dl -1 ; Hb 10 to 12 g dl -1 ; Hb >12 g dl -1 )




                      <10 g dl-1

                      10 to 12 g dl-1

                      >12 g dl-1





                      Age (yr)

                      63.5 (16.8)

                      61.8 (16.4)

                      61.8 (15.5)

                      Height (cm)

                      165.8 (9.2)

                      166.1 (9.2)

                      170.0 (8.9)

                      Weight (kg)

                      73.3 (22.1)

                      78.9 (23.7)

                      85.7 (23.3)

                      BMI (kg m-2)

                      26.8 (8.1)

                      28.7 (8.7)

                      29.7 (8.2)

                      Creatinine (μmol l-1)

                      79.8 (39.0)

                      78.7 (29.5)

                      83.4 (28.9)

             peak (ml min-1)a

                      960 (330)

                      1150 (430)

                      1380 (500)

             peak (ml kg-1 min-1)b

                      13.0 (4.5)

                      14.5 (5.4)

                      16.1 (5.8)

             peak (ml kg-0.83 min-1)c, g

                      27.8 (6.9)

                      31.5 (8.1)

                      34.3 (8.1)

                      AT (ml min-1)d

                      760 (190)

                      860 (260)

                      970 (310)

                      AT (ml kg-1 min-1)e

                      10.3 (2.5)

                      10.9 (3.2)

                      11.3 (3.6)

                      AT (ml kg-0.83 min-1)f, g

                      21.3 (4.3)

                      23.5 (4.8)

                      24.4 (4.8)


                      26.7 (4.8)

                      25.3 (5.4)

                      26.0 (6.8)


                      31.7 (5.9)

                      30.2 (5.9)

                      31.0 (6.6)

                      BMI body mass index, and , ventilatory equivalents for oxygen and carbon dioxide at the AT; AT, anaerobic threshold; peak, peak oxygen uptake. Values are mean (SD). aANOVA, P <0.0001; linear trend, P <0.0001. bANOVA, P <0.0001; linear trend, P < 0.0001. cANOVA, P <0.0001; linear trend, P <0.0001; dANOVA, P <0.0001; elinear trend, P < 0.0001; flinear trend, P < 0.0001; gAdjusted for weight, testing site, age, sex, revised cardiac risk index, diabetes, creatinine and operation category.

                      Haemoglobin concentration showed weak correlation with peak (r2 0.30, P <0.0001) and AT (r2 0.24, P <0.0001), after adjusting for weight and testing centre. Correlations between [Hb] and peak at each site were: Whittington (r2 0.30, P <0.0001), Torbay (r2 0.16, P = 0.004), UCLH (r2 0.31, P <0.0001), and Newcastle (r2 0.33, P <0.0001). Correlations between [Hb] and AT at each site were; Whittington (r2 0.23, P <0.0001), Torbay (r2 0.23, P <0.0001), UCLH (r2 0.24, P <0.0001), and Newcastle (r2 0.33, P <0.0001).

                      Regression models

                      An increase in [Hb] by one SD was associated with a 9.7% (95% CI, 8.2 to 11.3) increase in peak after adjusting for weight (P <0.0001), which was reduced to 6.7% (95% CI, 5.4 to 7.8) after adjusting for age, sex, weight and testing centre (P <0.0001). The percentage of the variance in peak explained by [Hb] was 8.9% (P <0.0001) after adjusting for weight, and 5.5% (P <0.0001) after adjusting for age, sex, weight and testing site. An increase in [Hb] by one SD was associated with a 6.0% (95% CI, 4.8 to 7.3) increase in AT after adjusting for weight P <0.0001), which was reduced to 4.4% (95% CI, 3.3 to 5.5) after adjusting for age, sex, weight and testing centre (P <0.0001). The percentage of variance in AT explained by [Hb] was 5.9% (P 0.0001) after weight adjustment, reducing to 3.5% (P <0.0001) after adjusting for age, sex, weight and testing centre.

                      Analysis of covariance across haemoglobin group

             peak and AT increased across [Hb] groups, after adjusting for confounding variables (P <0.0001, Table 3 and Figure 3).
                      Figure 3

                      Allometrically scaled oxygen uptake (ml kg -0.83 min -1 ) across [Hb] group (<10 g dl -1 , 10 to 12 g dl -1 , >12 g dl -1 ); peak (A) and at the anaerobic threshold (AT) (B). Mean +/- SD values adjusted for weight, testing site, age, sex, revised cardiac risk index, diabetes, creatinine and operation category. P <0.0001 (ANOVA) and trend (P <0.0001) for both measures. Hb, haemoglobin concentration.

                      Table 3

                      Allometrically scaled oxygen uptake


                      Haemoglobin concentration



                      <10 g dl-1

                      10 to 12 g dl-1

                      >12 g dl-1



             peak (ml kg-0.83.min-1)

                      26.7 (7.8) 83

                      29.9 (8.4) 352

                      34.4 (10.1) 1339



                      27.8 (7.1) 83

                      31.2 (8.2) 352

                      34.0 (8.7) 1333



                      27.8 (6.9) 64

                      31.5 (8.1) 291

                      34.3 (8.1) 1136



                      AT (ml kg-0.83.min-1)

                      20.9 (4.6) 67

                      22.7 (5.0) 307

                      24.4 (5.2) 1257



                      21.3 (4.5) 67

                      23.2 (4.9) 307

                      24.3 (5.1) 1251




                      21.3 (4.3) 49

                      23.5 (4.8) 252

                      24.4 (4.8) 1068



             peak and AT, mean (SD) number of patients, by haemoglobin classification. AT anaerobic threshold, [Hb] haemoglobin concentration, peak, peak oxygen uptake.

                      aAdjusted for weight and testing site.

                      bAdjusted for weight, testing site, age, sex.

                      cAdjusted for weight, testing site, age, sex, revised cardiac risk index, diabetes, creatinine and operation category.

                      We analysed allometrically scaled peak across individual surgical cohorts, with and without adjustment for confounders. peak did not differ in hepatobiliary patients across [Hb] groups. peak increased across each [Hb] group for colorectal, bariatric and other (mainly urological) patients, after adjusting for all confounders (testing centre, age, sex, weight, RCRI, diabetes, serum creatinine and operation category). peak increased across each [Hb] classification for upper gastrointestinal and vascular patients after adjustment for testing centre, age, sex and weight, but not when additional confounders (RCRI, diabetes, serum creatinine and operation category) were added. peak increased with each [Hb] group for maxillofacial patients after adjusting for testing and weight, but not when additional confounders were added to the model.


                      To our knowledge, this is the largest study to explore the relationship between oxygen uptake and haemoglobin concentration in the clinical setting, and the first to control for body mass with allometric (log-linear) scaling. Oxygen uptake at peak exercise and at the anaerobic threshold (AT) increased with haemoglobin concentration [Hb], after adjusting for measured confounding variables.

                      The [Hb] was 10 to 12 g dl-1 in 353 patients (20%) and <10 g dl-1 in 83 (5%) patients. Other studies have reported rates of anaemia between 5% and 76%, a range partly dependent upon the indication for surgery and definition of anaemia [9]. The American College of Surgeons’ National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) recently reported a similar prevalence of preoperative anaemia (30.4%) [15].

                      The mean AT of 11 ml kg-1 min-1 is similar to that reported by other studies of preoperative populations [7, 36, 37]. However, this value is 2 to 3 ml kg-1 min-1 less than gender-specific reference values for age and height [38]. The mean peak in our population, 15.5 ml kg-1 min-1, is 11 ml kg-1 min-1 less than gender-specific reference values for age and height [38, 39]. The aim of allometric scaling is to appropriately account for body size (that is, the scaled variable no longer varies with body size) [40]. Oxygen uptake is usually reported per unit body mass, ml kg-1 min-1, a scale that requires further adjustment for body size [41]. In the obese, oxygen uptake expressed as ml kg-1 min-1 underestimates fitness and overestimates risk [42]. In the cachectic patient this scale overestimates fitness and underestimates risk [43].

                      Both AT and peak increased with [Hb], for the whole population, across individual testing sites and across all groups, except hepatobiliary surgery. However, this relationship was weak and although being highly statistically significant does not necessarily reflect a magnitude of clinical association. Nonetheless, an increase in [Hb] by one standard deviation (that is, 1.8 g dl-1 rise in [Hb]) was associated with a 9.7% and 6.0% increase in weight-adjusted peak and AT. The [Hb] explained 9% and 6% of the variance in peak and AT respectively. The increase in AT and peak with [Hb] may be due to increased oxygen-carrying capacity, or patients who are not anaemic exercising more than patients who are anaemic, or due to confounding. For instance, sick patients may be both anaemic and less fit. In addition, differences in AT, to some extent (although probably small), may be explained by inherent variations in measurement and/or interpretation or physiological context [44].

                      The cause of anaemia may be important. The most common cause is reported to be chronic disease, the severity of which being related to the degree of systemic inflammation [45, 46]. Features of anaemia due to chronic disease include reduced red cell survival, impaired erythropoiesis, and impaired iron metabolism, all of which may reduce AT and peak, directly or in combination [47]. Iron status was not routinely assessed in our cohort but may independently influence fitness markers in the absence of anaemia. For example, iron deficiency with or without anaemia is associated with reduced fitness [4850].

                      This study had some limitations. The observational, cross-sectional and retrospective nature of the data generates causative hypotheses but does not test them [51]. It would have been valuable to assess the association of overall survival and critical care use with both anaemia and oxygen uptake. The [Hb] may be an imprecise measure of blood oxygen carrying capacity, given that its value is influenced by disease- or therapy-related contractions or expansions in plasma volume. For instance, oxygen-carrying capacity may be normal if [Hb] is low due simply to an increase in intravascular volume. A better measure of oxygen-carrying capacity may thus be total mass of haemoglobin (tHb-mass). The tHb-mass displays a higher correlation with peak (r2 = 0.79) than either blood volume (r2 = 0.76) or [Hb] [52, 53]. The relatively small explained variance in AT and peak by [Hb] (oxygen carrying capacity) in the current study suggests that other factors may play an important role in determining aerobic capacity. For example, other physiological factors that may limit peak include pulmonary diffusing capacity, cardiac output and skeletal muscle limitations [54]. Although it is suggested that the AT reflects an imbalance in oxygen demand-supply, that is, that AT reflects onset of anaerobiosis, this is a much-debated and controversial concept [44, 55]. In addition, variations in the AT, to some extent may be explained by inherent discrepancies in its measurement and/or interpretation [44].

                      Future studies of preoperative cardiopulmonary exercise testing should include [Hb] with long-term survival and quality of life as outcomes as well as considering alternative endpoints measured during exercise testing such as metabolic efficiency and the oxygen pulse [44].


                      In conclusion, anaemia is common in preoperative patients undergoing elective major surgery. There is an association between haemoglobin concentration and oxygen uptake during exercise, both peak and AT, even after adjusting for measured confounding variables. Future studies may wish to address whether reversing anaemia before surgery improves these values, and thereby increases postoperative survival and function.


                      Authors’ Affiliations

                      Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London
                      The Portex Unit, UCL Institute of Child Health
                      Department of Medicine, Centre of Cardiovascular Genetics, University College London
                      Integrative Physiology and Critical Illness Group, Division of Clinical and Experimental Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton
                      UCL Institute for Human Health and Performance
                      Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Freeman Hospital
                      Torbay Hospital, South Devon Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Torbay Hospital


                      1. Wasserman K, Koike A: Is the Anaerobic Threshold Truly Anaerobic? Chest 1992,101(5 Suppl):S211-S218.
                      2. Myers J, Ashley E: Dangerous curves. A perspective on exercise, lactate, and the anaerobic threshold. Chest 1997, 111:787–795.PubMedView Article
                      3. Brooks GA: Anaerobic threshold: review of the concept and directions for future research. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1985, 17:22–34.PubMed
                      4. Older P, Smith R: Experience with the preoperative invasive measurement of haemodynamic, respiratory and renal function in 100 elderly patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care 1988, 16:389–395.PubMed
                      5. Shoemaker WC, Appel PL, Kram HB, Waxman K, Lee TS: Prospective trial of supranormal values of survivors as therapeutic goals in high-risk surgical patients. Chest 1988, 94:1176–1186.PubMedView Article
                      6. Carlisle J, Swart M: Mid-term survival after abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery predicted by cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Br J Surg 2007, 94:966–969.PubMedView Article
                      7. Older P, Hall A, Hader R: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing as a screening test for perioperative management of major surgery in the elderly. Chest 1999, 116:355–362.PubMedView Article
                      8. Snowden CP, Prentis JM, Anderson HL, Roberts DR, Randles D, Renton M, Manas DM: Submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing predicts complications and hospital length of stay in patients undergoing major elective surgery. Ann Surg 2010, 251:535–541.PubMedView Article
                      9. Shander A, Knight K, Thurer R, Adamson J, Spence R: Prevalence and outcomes of anemia in surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Am J Med 2004,116(Suppl 7A):58S-69S.PubMedView Article
                      10. Horwich TB, Fonarow GC, Hamilton MA, MacLellan WR, Borenstein J: Anemia is associated with worse symptoms, greater impairment in functional capacity and a significant increase in mortality in patients with advanced heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002, 39:1780–1786.PubMedView Article
                      11. Dunne JR, Malone D, Tracy JK, Gannon C, Napolitano LM: Perioperative anemia: an independent risk factor for infection, mortality, and resource utilization in surgery. J Surg Res 2002, 102:237–244.PubMedView Article
                      12. Beattie WS, Karkouti K, Wijeysundera DN, Tait G: Risk associated with preoperative anemia in noncardiac surgery: a single-center cohort study. Anesthesiology 2009, 110:574–581.PubMedView Article
                      13. Karkouti K, Wijeysundera DN, Beattie WS: Risk associated with preoperative anemia in cardiac surgery: a multicenter cohort study. Circulation 2008, 117:478–484.PubMedView Article
                      14. Kulier A, Levin J, Moser R, Rumpold-Seitlinger G, Tudor IC, Snyder-Ramos SA, Moehnle P, Mangano DT: Impact of preoperative anemia on outcome in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation 2007, 116:471–479.PubMedView Article
                      15. Musallam KM, Tamim HM, Richards T, Spahn DR, Rosendaal FR, Habbal A, Khreiss M, Dahdaleh FS, Khavandi K, Sfeir PM, Soweid A, Hoballah JJ, Taher AT, Jamali FR: Preoperative anaemia and postoperative outcomes in non-cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2011, 378:1396–1407.PubMedView Article
                      16. Ferraris VA, Davenport DL, Saha SP, Austin PC, Zwischenberger JB: Surgical outcomes and transfusion of minimal amounts of blood in the operating room. Arch Surg 2012, 147:49–55.PubMedView Article
                      17. Saltin B, Strange S: Maximal oxygen uptake: "old" and "new" arguments for a cardiovascular limitation. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1992, 24:30–37.PubMed
                      18. Wagner PD: Muscle O 2 transport and O 2 dependent control of metabolism. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995, 27:47–53.PubMed
                      19. Ekblom B, Goldbarg AN, Gullbring B: Response to exercise after blood loss and reinfusion. J Appl Physiol 1972, 33:175–180.PubMed
                      20. Berglund B, Ekblom B: Effect of recombinant human erythropoietin treatment on blood pressure and some haematological parameters in healthy men. J Intern Med 1991, 229:125–130.PubMedView Article
                      21. Calbet JA, Lundby C, Koskolou M, Boushel R: Importance of hemoglobin concentration to exercise: acute manipulations. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2006, 151:132–140.PubMedView Article
                      22. ATS/ACCP: ATS/ACCP Statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003, 167:211–277.View Article
                      23. Wasserman K, Hansen JE, Sue DY, Stringer WW, Whipp BJ: Principles of Exercise Testing and Interpretation Including Pathophysiology and Clinical Applications. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
                      24. Beaver WL, Wasserman K, Whipp BJ: A new method for detecting anaerobic threshold by gas exchange. J Appl Physiol 1986, 60:2020–2027.PubMed
                      25. Midgley AW, McNaughton LR, Carroll S: Effect of the VO 2 time-averaging interval on the reproducibility of VO 2max in healthy athletic subjects. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2007, 27:122–125.PubMedView Article
                      26. Wasserman K: The anaerobic threshold: definition, physiological significance and identification. Adv Cardiol 1986, 35:1–23.PubMed
                      27. Lee TH, Marcantonio ERM CM, Thomas EJ, Polanczyk CA, Cook EF, Sugarbaker DJ, Donaldson MC, Poss R, Ho KK, Ludwig LE, Pedan A, Goldman L: Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery. Circulation 1999, 100:1043–1049.PubMedView Article
                      28. Nevill AM, Holder RL: Modelling health-related performance indices. Ann Hum Biol 2000, 27:543–559.PubMedView Article
                      29. Nevill AM, Ramsbottom R, Williams C: Scaling physiological measurements for individuals of different body size. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1992, 65:110–117.PubMedView Article
                      30. Tanner JM: Fallacy of per-weight and per-surface area standards, and their relation to spurious correlation. J Appl Physiol 1949, 2:1–15.PubMed
                      31. Toth MJ, Goran MI, Ades PA, Howard DB, Poehlman ET: Examination of data normalization procedures for expressing peak VO 2 data. J Appl Physiol 1993, 75:2288–2292.PubMed
                      32. Winter EM, Brookes FB, Hamley EJ: Maximal exercise performance and lean leg volume in men and women. J Sports Sci 1991, 9:3–13.PubMedView Article
                      33. Batterham AM, Vanderburgh PMM MT, Jackson AS: Modeling the influence of body size on VO 2 peak: effects of model choice and body composition. J Appl Physiol 1999, 87:1317–1325.PubMed
                      34. Nevill AM, Holder RL: Scaling, normalizing, and per ratio standards: an allometric modeling approach. J Appl Physiol 1995, 79:1027–1031.PubMed
                      35. Wu WC, Schifftner TL, Henderson WG, Eaton CB, Poses RM, Uttley G, Sharma SC, Vezeridis M, Khuri SF, Friedmann PD: Preoperative hematocrit levels and postoperative outcomes in older patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. JAMA 2007, 297:2481–2488.PubMedView Article
                      36. Wilson RJ, Davies S, Yates D, Redman J, Stone M: Impaired functional capacity is associated with all-cause mortality after major elective intra-abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth 2010, 105:297–303.PubMedView Article
                      37. Hennis PJ, Meale PM, Hurst RA, O'Doherty AF, Otto J, Kuper M, Harper N, Sufi PA, Heath D, Montgomery HE, Grocott MP: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing predicts postoperative outcome in patients undergoing gastric bypass surgery. Br J Anaesth 2012, 109:566–571.PubMedView Article
                      38. Davis JA, Storer TW, Caiozzo VJ: Prediction of normal values for lactate threshold estimated by gas exchange in men and women. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1997, 76:157–164.PubMedView Article
                      39. Koch B, Schaper C, Ittermann T, Spielhagen T, Dorr M, Volzke H, Opitz CF, Ewert R, Glaser S: Reference values for cardiopulmonary exercise testing in healthy volunteers: the SHIP study. Eur Respir J 2009, 33:389–397.PubMedView Article
                      40. Albrecht GH, Gelvin BR, Hartman SE: Ratios as a size adjustment in morphometrics. Am J Phys Anthropol 1993, 91:441–468.PubMedView Article
                      41. Welsman JR, Armstrong N: Statistical Techniques for Interpreting Body Size-Related Exercise Performance During Growth. Pediatr Exerc Sci 2000, 12:112–127.
                      42. Milano GE, Rodacki A, Radominski RB, Leite N: Scale of VO 2 peak in obese and non-obese adolescents by different methods. Arq Bras Cardiol 2009, 93:554–557. 598–602PubMedView Article
                      43. Donohoe CL, Ryan AM, Reynolds JV: Cancer cachexia: mechanisms and clinical implications. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2011, 2011:601434.PubMed
                      44. Hopker JG, Jobson SA, Pandit JJ: Controversies in the physiological basis of the 'anaerobic threshold' and their implications for clinical cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Anaesthesia 2011, 66:111–123.PubMedView Article
                      45. Weiss G: Pathogenesis and treatment of anaemia of chronic disease. Blood Rev 2002, 16:87–96.PubMedView Article
                      46. Cartwright GE: The anemia of chronic disorders. Semin Hematol 1966, 3:351–375.PubMed
                      47. Means RT Jr: Advances in the anemia of chronic disease. Int J Hematol 1999, 70:7–12.PubMed
                      48. Celsing F, Blomstrand E, Werner B, Pihlstedt P, Ekblom B: Effects of iron deficiency on endurance and muscle enzyme activity in man. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1986, 18:156–161.PubMed
                      49. Klingshirn LA, Pate RR, Bourque SP, Davis JM, Sargent RG: Effect of iron supplementation on endurance capacity in iron-depleted female runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1992, 24:819–824.PubMed
                      50. Newhouse IJ, Clement DBT JE, McKenzie DC: The effects of prelatent/latent iron deficiency on physical work capacity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1989, 21:263–268.PubMed
                      51. Mann CJ: Observational research methods. Research design II: cohort, cross sectional, and case-control studies. Emerg Med J 2003, 20:54–60.PubMedView Article
                      52. Kanstrup IL, Ekblom B: Blood volume and hemoglobin concentration as determinants of maximal aerobic power. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1984, 16:256–262.PubMed
                      53. Schmidt W, Prommer N: Effects of various training modalities on blood volume. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2008,18(Suppl 1):57–69.PubMedView Article
                      54. Bassett DR Jr, Howley ET: Limiting factors for maximum oxygen uptake and determinants of endurance performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000, 32:70–84.PubMed
                      55. Whipp BJ, Ward SA: The physiological basis of the 'anaerobic threshold' and implications for clinical cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Anaesthesia 2011, 66:1049–1050.View Article

                      This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.