Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of studies describing post-operative changes in right ventricular function and their clinical significance in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery

From: Epidemiology of perioperative RV dysfunction: risk factors, incidence, and clinical implications

Study

Surgical population

N

Age

Proportion male (%)

Method of assessment

Definition of RVD

Postoperative change

Clinical significance/comments

Reed et al. (1992)

Thoracic (lobectomy and pneumonectomy)

15

65 (1.8)

80%

PAC

RVEF

RVEDV

Early post-op vs POD2:

• RVEF: 0.40 (0.01) to 0.36 (0.03)

• RVEDV: 153 (10) to 173 (14)

‘Three patients had periods of sustained atrial arrhythmias on POD 1 or 2 and at the time had significant increases in RVEDV’

Okada et al. (1994)

Thoracic (predominantly lobectomy)

20

62 (49-77)

90%

PAC

RVEF

RVEDV

Preop vs POD1 vs 3 weeks:

• RVEF: 0.43 (0.07) to 0.36 (0.04) to 0.36 (0.34) (p < 0.05)

• RVEDV increased on POD2: 112 (20) vs 130 (24) ml/m2 (p < 0.05)

RVEF remained depressed 3 weeks post-op

Urban et al. (1996)

Orthopaedic (revision THJR)

18

41–88

Not provided

PAC

TOE (in some)

Decrease in RVEF ≥ 10% and increase PAP ≥ 10 mmHg

RVD in 4 of 18 (22%) at end of surgery

Transient increase in inotropic support. Mortality in one patient ‘complications related to bone cement implantation syndrome’

Xu et al. (2014)

Oesophagectomy

40

59.0 (7.8) A

60.6 (6.6) A

73%

PAC

RVEF

Approx. 5% reduction overall at end of surgery

Not examined

Wang et al. (2016)

Thoracic (pneumonectomy and lobectomy)

30

53.1 ± 10.7 A

57.0 ± 11.4A

73%

TTE

RVFWLS

RVGLS

All pre-op vs 1-week post-op:

Pneumonectomy

• RVFWLS: − 30.86 (5.88) to − 11.77 (4.14)

• RVGLS: − 24.56 (5.32) to − 12.04 (5.33)

Lobectomy

• RVFWLS: − 29.7 (6.23) to − 18.03 (8.06)

• RVGLS: − 25.69 (4.71) to − 17.07 (5.26)

p < 0.05 for all

Not examined

McCall et al. (2019)

Thoracic (anatomical lobectomy)

27

67 (59-74)

37%

CMR

RVEF

RVEF deteriorated from 50.5% (6.9) pre-op to 44.9 (7.2) on POD2 (p = 0.003)

RVEF on POD2 associated with length of postoperative critical care unit stay (r =  − 0.653, p = 0.001)

RVEF remains depressed vs. baseline 3-month post-op

Segerstad et al. (2019)

Orthopaedic (THJR)

22

76 (8.1) A

74 (6.2) A

36%

PAC

RVEF

8% reduction in cemented, unchanged in uncemented

Not examined

Gouvêa et al. (2022)

Liver transplantation

19

52 (13)

TOE

TAPSE < 17 mm or FAC < 35%

No change at end of surgery

Right ventricular function was found to be normal throughout the procedure

  1. Data presented as proportion of patients exhibiting predefined reduction in RVD parameter or as change in a continuous parameter as described in the original paper
  2. AData presented for two experimental groups separately
  3. CMR cardiovascular magnetic resonance, FAC fractional area change, NS non-significant, PAC pulmonary artery catheter, PAP pulmonary artery pressure, POD postoperative day, RVD right ventricular dysfunction, RVEDV(I) RV end-diastolic volume (index), RVEF RV ejection fraction, RVFWLS RV free wall longitudinal strain, RVGLS right ventricular global longitudinal strain, TAPSE tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, THJR total hip joint replacement, TOE transoesophageal echocardiography, transthoracic echocardiography